Answer:
Option 2 is the right answer
Explanation:
When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.
Participant observation I think hope this helps :)
Several Medical and Law experts gathered together and debated the formation of a new half government half privatized department to assist the Fire Department and Police in the field faster than the hospital could. In fact back then even experts debated to make a law that drivers must yield to emergency vehicles. However that law didn't become official until 1996 when a Paramedic was struck and killed by another vehicle.
Individuals who send law enforcement agencies information via social media are referred to as Citizen journalists.
<h3>What is Citizen journalists?</h3>
Citizen journalists are the phrase that is used to define a people that report information to law enforcement agencies with the help of social media.
Under this approach, Peoples can be evaluated and acknowledged on a worldwide scale through citizen journalism. The transmission of message and news does not totally reveal accurate orientations of current events.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Learn more about the Citizen journalists, refer to:
brainly.com/question/10160256
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
This experiment conducted by Nicole Ruedy helps the authors central idea. She looked at all of the information that the author provided and determined that the information gather was relevant and applicable to her opinions. She made additional points to further research for the author.
