1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DiKsa [7]
1 year ago
15

Wages. JoAnn works in the publicity office at the state university. She is paid $10 an hour for the first 35 hours she works eac

h week and $15 an hour for every hour after that. If she makes $515 one week, how many hours did she work?She worked for ? hours.
Mathematics
2 answers:
rosijanka [135]1 year ago
5 0

Since Joann receives $10 per hour for the first 35 hours, so she receives $350 (35 times $10) before she starts receiving extra hours.

Since she received $515, we know that she worked extra hours.

Let's use the variable x to represent the number of extra hours worked.

So we can write the following equation for the total payment received:

\begin{gathered} 10\cdot35+15\cdot x=515 \\ 350+15x=515 \\ 15x=515-350 \\ 15x=165 \\ x=11 \end{gathered}

She worked 11 extra hours. Adding this to the 35 regular hours, so she worked for 46 hours.

FrozenT [24]1 year ago
3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

46

You might be interested in
Pablo wrote four division equations with 6 as the quotient. what could have been the four division equations he wrote?
Gennadij [26K]
\frac{18}{3}=6 \\ \\
 \frac{12}{2}=6 \\ \\
\frac{6}{1}=6
7 0
3 years ago
Keenan gives Tisha half of his strawberries. Tisha keeps 4 of the strawberries she hit from Keenan and gives the rest to suvi. W
Darya [45]
Let’s say that Keenan give Tisha 8 of the 16 strawberries he had. So Tisha kept 4 of the 8 strawberries she got from Keenan and gave the rest to Suvi. The expression could be written like this: 16-8=8-4=4
8 0
3 years ago
Help me please these Recharf
RSB [31]
I’m not to sure sorry good luck
6 0
2 years ago
The following are the temperatures of 10 days in winter in °C. − 3 , 0 , 10 , 2 , 8 , − 5 , − 1 , 9 , 2 , − 3 Work out the mean
marissa [1.9K]

The mean temperature of the given data − 3 , 0 , 10 , 2 , 8 , − 5 , − 1 , 9 , 2 , − 3 is 1.9

mean= 1.9

<h3>What is mean of the data?</h3>

The mean, or average, is calculated by adding up the data and dividing by total number of data.

Given data: − 3 , 0 , 10 , 2 , 8 , − 5 , − 1 , 9 , 2 , − 3

Now, mean =   \frac{sum \;of\; observation}{Total \;number \;of \;observation}

mean = \frac{(-3)+ 0+10+2+8+(-5)+ (-1)+ 9+2+(-3)}{10}

           = \frac{19}{10}

mean= 1.9

Hence, the mean of − 3 , 0 , 10 , 2 , 8 , − 5 , − 1 , 9 , 2 , − 3  is 1.9

Learn more about mean here:

brainly.com/question/22871228

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
A study was conducted to determine whether magnets were effective in treating pain. The values represent measurements of pain us
Zanzabum

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The objective of the study is to determine whether the magnets are effective in treating pain. For these two independent groups of individuals with equal affections were randomly sampled, one was treated with magnets and the other group of individuals, call it control group, was treated with a placebo treatment.

The information for both samples is:

X₁: pain measurement using a visual analog scale after the individual received magnet treatments.

X₁~N(μ₁;σ₁²)

n₁= 20

X[bar]₁= 0.46

S₁= 0.93

X₂: pain measurement using a visual analog scale of an individual of the control groups.

X₂~N(μ₂;σ₂²)

n₂= 20

X[bar]₂= 0.41

S₂= 1.26

The claim is that the pain reductions of the control group have more variation than the pain reductions of the target group. If it's so then we could suspect that the population variance of the control group, σ₂², will be greater than the population variance of the magnet group, σ₁².

To test the relationship between these two population variances you have to conduct a variance ratio test using the Snedecors F statistic.

The hypotheses are:

H₀: σ₂² ≤ σ₁²

H₁: σ₂² > σ₁²

α: 0.05

F= (\frac{S_2^2}{S_1^2}) * (\frac{Sigma_2^2}{Sigma_1^2} )~~ F_{(n_2-1);(n_1-1)}

This hypothesis test is one-tailed to the right, there is only one critical value:

F_{(n_2-1);(n_1-1); 1 - \alpha } = F_{19;19; 0.95}= 2.17

The decision rule for the test is:

If F_{H_0} ≥ 2.17, then the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If F_{H_0} < 2.17, then the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

F_{H_0}= \frac{S_2^2}{S_1^2}*\frac{Sigma_2^2}{Sigma_1^2}  = \frac{(1.26)^2}{(0.93)^2} * 1

F_{H_0} = 1.835 = 1.84

Since the calculated value of F is less than the critical value, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis. So using a 5% significance level the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis, you can conclude that the population variance of the pain reduction of the control group is less or equal than the population variance of the pain reduction on individuals treated with magnets.

I hope it helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Joe had y cars and wrecked 15 how much cars remaing
    11·1 answer
  • Please answer as soon as possibly
    13·1 answer
  • What is the value of y?<br><br> a. 30<br><br> b. 120<br><br> c. 60<br><br> d. 180
    6·1 answer
  • If f(x)=3x squared -2x + 1 what is f(x-2)
    14·1 answer
  • (X-6) squared + (y+2) squared =
    10·1 answer
  • Enter the values for the highlighted variables to
    10·1 answer
  • Please answer a) through d).
    8·2 answers
  • The area of a rectangular dance floor is 8 1/4
    15·1 answer
  • What is (3+x)(4+x) in standard form ?
    6·1 answer
  • Find the distance between v = [1; 2; 3]t and w = [-2; 1;2]t
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!