The Germans thought Calais was the likely landing site for an Allied invasion because the Allies made them think that's what they were planning.
The Allies employed various strategies, code named "Operation Fortitude," which were intended to deceive the Germans in advance of the planned Normandy invasion. They built up phony infrastructure for possible invasions, on at Calais just across the English Channel, another as a northern incursion via Norway. They also leaked phony intelligence reports that would find their way into German hands. So Calais seemed logistically sound not only because it was directly across the Channel from Allied positions in Britain, but because the Allies were wanting the Germans to think that was a possible plan they were making. The deception was meant to give the actual invasion at Normandy a better chance for success.
Depression is a strong saddening, sorry are you looking for a depression definition???
I think that <span>extrapolating the behaviors of ancient hunter-gatherers by studying modern hunter-gatherer groups is a valid approach.
Modern hunter-gatherer groups learn how to do their daily tasks from the lessons and teachings imparted to them by their elders. Their elders also learned from their elders and so on. This is how knowledge and skills are passed down from one generation to another. One way or another, the methods and applications that modern hunter-gatherer groups use originated from the behaviors of ancient hunter-gatherers. There may be changes but these changes are usually applied in order for the group to adapt to the conditions that they are living in at that time.
In short, </span><span>learning about modern hunter-gatherer groups is vital in understanding early societies because the practices of today are the results of the practices of yesterday with variation to ensure longevity.</span>
It had two impacts in the US.
-we no longer have acid rain and pollution decreased
-contributed to the deep splits between conservatives and liberals.