No, the average change in population is not the same as it was 50 years ago.
Reason in Support of the Answer:
In many important ways, the demographic future of the United States and the rest of the world is substantially different from the recent past. The world's average population approximately tripled between 1950 and 2010, and the U.S. population nearly doubled.
However, it is anticipated that between 2010 and 2050, both globally and in the United States, average population growth will be substantially slower and will disproportionately favor the oldest age groups. Hence it is seen that the average change in population is never constant. It depends on the demographic trends and conditions, whether the average change in population will be larger or comparatively trivial in the future. And, similarly, it can be said that the average change in population is not the same as it was 50 years ago.
Learn more about average here:
brainly.com/question/2426692
#SPJ1
Answer:
10/12
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply 5/6x2/2
The perimeter of his fence is 2400 the steps i took to find this was i divided 14400 by 6 an i got 2400. I can only think of one possible reason I hope the helps, Sorry
If you need the geometry and trigonometry I'll post those. Instead I found an answer at this link: http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/EMAT6450/Class%20Projects/Scarpelli/Scarpelli_MathematicsBaseballActivity.....
The distance from home plate to the pitcher's mound is 60.5 feet and from home plate to second base is <span>127.28 feet.
Pitcher's Mound to 2nd base = </span><span>
<span>
<span>
66.78</span> </span>f</span>eet
Given those distances, we KNOW a 50 foot sprinkler will NOT reach home plate and second base from the pitcher's mound.
I didn't figure out the pitcher's mound to 1st or to 3rd, since the question is already answered.
