Answer:
Unique selling proposition.
Answer:
Walter company Journal $
Date
Bond investment Dr 1,000,000
Bond premium Dr 50,000
Bank Cr. 1,050,000
Narration. Bond retirement at a premium of 5% over par.
Explanation:
The bond investment account is kept fixed at the amount at which it was subscribe, the corresponding interest are debited to income statement on payment to the bond holders.
In the same vein the retirement of the bond at a premium represents an expenses to the firm which has to be debited to the income statement on payment to the bond holders.
Specific Goals are goals that are specific, and example would be “I want to go to the beach and meditiate” so you would make it specific by saying in detail how you would get there like “sub” goals. Realistic Goals is when you have a goal that can be achieved. I’m not sure what a planning goal is.
Answer:
Depletion expenses for the first year is $210736.840
Explanation:
Depletion expenses= (Cost of coal mine - residual value) / Total tons of coal * tons extracted
=(1,001,000 - $0) / 57,000 tons * 12,000 tons
=$210736.8421
=$210736.840
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
