I think your answer would be B, it points forward.
<span>True</span>
<span>
</span>
<span>Dialogue certainly is the best
method to use when analyzing a character because we can learn so much. Let’s say you are reading a story where the
main character reads a sign a person standing on a street corner is holding
that says, “Can you spare some change?”
After reading that sign, the main character walks up to that person and
yells in his face, “Why don’t you go get a job!?” What can be learned from this interaction? What can be deciphered from this is that the
main character is insensitive to the plights of others and apparently incapable
(or unwilling) to see things objectively and from a perspective other than his
own so much so that he jumps to conclusions and feels the person is just lazy
when, in fact, the person may have just recently lost a job, has bills that
need immediate paying, and/or is perhaps waiting for unemployment benefits to
become active while looking for a new job.
As you can see, thus, dialogue can be quite useful in analyzing a
character.</span>
Answer:
no
Explanation:
Its to messy for you to solve
You are too reckless and impatient.
You should think twice before jumping
to the wrong conclusion. —— second person
He opened the window and welcomed
the warm summer breeze. He had never
felt so alive before.—— third person
I was frustrated with myself. I had been
unable to see the solution, even though
it was staring me right in the face.—— first person
