Answer:
The actual return on investment was 16.67%
Explanation:
the Return on Investment, will be the net income copared with the own funds (equity). So, we will compare the 50,000 net income with the owner's equity 300,000
50,000/300,000 = 0.1667 = 16.67%
The return on investment is 16.67% This means for every dollar of equity the comany earn 16.67 cent
It also means the company will return their entire investment in:
1/ROI = 1/0.166666 = 6 years
<u>Answer:</u>
True
<u>Explanation:</u>
Industry specific sites usually consumed/visited by people who has keen interest and caliber in the industry. When posting the jobs on these type of sites, the probability of the company selecting candidates with higher skill set in the related industry tend to get higher as compared to posting it in normal job posting sites. Well you always seek for a person who has better aptitude and better understanding of things. A person belonging from industry will surely be having all these good qualities.
Answer:
Bundle 1: Beer = 2; Pizza = 6
Bundle 2: Beer = 3; Pizza = 4
Bundle 3: Beer = 4; Pizza = 3
Bundle 4: Beer = 12; Pizza = 1
Explanation:
Given that;
Lisa utility function UF(X,Y) = 4XY
where;
X = beer
Y = Pizza
The utility level = 48
so, UF(X,Y) = 4XY
putting different values of X (i.e beer ) given to us in this equation, we can calculate the values of Y(i.e pizza) to fulfill the utility
So; when X (beer) = 2
48 = 4×2×Y
48 = 8Y
Y = 48/8
Y = 6
Thus, Bundle 1: Beer = 2; Pizza = 6
when X (beer) = 3
48 = 4×3×Y
48 = 12 Y
Y = 48/12
Y = 4
Thus; Bundle 2: Beer = 3; Pizza = 4
when X (beer) = 4
48 = 4×4×Y
48 = 16 Y
Y = 48/16
Y = 3
Thus; Bundle 3: Beer = 4; Pizza = 3
when X(beer) = 12
48 = 4×12×Y
48 = 48 Y
Y = 48/48
Y = 1
Thus; Bundle 4: Beer = 12; Pizza = 1
Answer:
The president of Riggs has missed something.
She should make the Sail instead of buying because its cheaper to manufacture than purchasing it outside.
Explanation:
<u>Cost of Manufacturing the Sails:</u>
Direct materials $93
Direct Labor $83
Total $173
The president of Riggs has included the $90 overhead based on $78,000 of annual fixed overhead that is allocated using normal capacity in the cost of manufacturing the sail which is incorrect.
Riggs Company is operating at 80 % of full capacity, hence utelizing the 20% excess capacity would not expand its fixed costs.
Thus said the current fixed cost are irrelevent for this decison and would be incurred whether or not Riggs Company utilizes the excess capacity
<u>Conclusion:</u>
The cost of making the sail is $173 which is lower than the cost of buying them at $ 258.
I would advise The president of Riggs to make the sail by utilizing the excess capacity since its cheaper than purchasing it outside.
Answer:
It is $18,290.24
Explanation:
Profit after Tax (65%) = addition to retained earnings+dividend paid
= $411 + $285
= $ 696
Profit before Tax = [100/65] * $ 696
= $1070.76
Tax (35%) = 35% * $1070.76
= $374.77
Gross Profit = Profit before tax + Total expenses
= $1070.76 + [ $4,370+ $103+ $812]
= $6355.76
Cost of Sales= $24,646 -$6355.76
= $18,290.24 .
Note
-Dividend is paid is paid from profit after tax
