3) Consumer sovereignty concerns the principle of hedonism, individualism and, as some economists often say, selfishness, or exacerbated individual freedom, where the human being has complete freedom to do, whatever he wants and understands and, anywhere, nothing interferes with the decisions of those who need to satisfy their needs. This economic philosophy adopts the principle of laissez faire, or in other words, what works is Adam Smith's infamous <u>invisible hand</u>, or more clearly, the system where the government does not interfere in the economy, it exists only to coordinate the political and social system, without active participation in the development of economic activity. It is what is called in the classic and neoclassical language, an economy of free competition, that is to say, everyone is free before their preferred choices.
4) The economic system in the US is <u>free enterprise.</u> Free enterprise is a principle that establishes the possibility for ordinary people to participate in the market without the need for authorization or approval by the State. If you have the possibility to open a company, sell a product and negotiate the price that is right for you, you owe it to the principle of free enterprise.
The government has a fundamental role in the economic system, such as legislating, placing wealth in the market, as well as inspecting these systems.
5) The price floor wage is the lowest wage a company can pay for an employee. It is established by law and is reassessed every year based on the cost of living of the population, its creation was made based on the minimum amount that a person spends to guarantee their survival.
The most common price floor is the minimum wage--a minimum price that can be payed for labor.
Its either B or C. but if I'm not mistaken its c
<span>Among the choices, the one that describes an advantage oral history has over written history is C, Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. They aren't considered primary sources because they can be changed as time goes on, depending on the storyteller.</span>
Answer:
D. George Mason
Explanation:
A call for American independence from Britain, the Virginia Declaration of Rights was drafted by George Mason in May 1776 and amended by Thomas Ludwell Lee and the Virginia Convention.
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
