First of all we can not compare Chester, a serial killer, with Joey, who committed a murder without intent, the intention defines the type of crime, and consequently the penalty that it must be met. Joey should not be considered a criminal because he has no criminal mind, and his action was not planned, in addition to having special needs, which places him in a possible state of no criminal responsibility, that will depend on the level and type of disability he possess. According to the laws, parents are not obliged to disclose their children, but there is a responsibility regarding the obstruction of justice, and his father could respond criminally. In this case, you must ask for the acquittal of the penalty for the disability, but at the same time, the clarification of the circumstances to grant justice to those affected.
Because him and x are both complete savages.
Answer:
Writers react to war by experimenting with different styles of writing to describe in detail of how wars go.
Explanation:
When a writer changes their writing style, there is a reason on why. In this case, war. The writers reacted to this war by experimenting with their style of writing so they could describe the war in great detail. In a great tragedy like this, there are many ways the writers could detail and elaborate on how, for example, the soldiers fought. An example you could use to understand why the writers would do this is: <em>"The soldiers fought with great fearlessness and great-heart. Their swords reflecting the shining rays of light of the Sun."</em> As you can see, I used detailed words and let my words orchestrate an image in your head, in which the writers in this war were trying to do in this war.
Hoped this helped!
Sentence 2 lightning is spelt wrong
Sentence 3 diversity is spelt wrong.
