Answer:
Engineer Brown has been engaged in providing consulting engineering services for a number of years as a sole proprietor. Because his practice was growing, he recently hired another engineer and decided to commence offering professional services under the name of Brown and Associates. In order to comply with the rules he must
Notify the Board office of the name change
Explanation:
Since it is the same company but just with change of name changes, notification to the company he render services for is only needed to avoid confusion about the authenticity of the company
I would say C is the answer bc that’s would i would do in that situation.
Answer:$4650
Explanation:
The cost that is recoverable is $30 per hour that was agreed as the hour to be spent in learning the soft ware. The sunk cost it's an irrecoverable cost that does influence decision making. When the agreed leaning cost of $30 per hr for 45hr of $1350 is deducted from the asking price of $6000 we have the $4650
Answer:
The correct option which would not be an expected response from decrease in price level is A) with fall in prices, Fargo concrete company has decided to let go workers who have fixed price contracts.
Explanation:
All the options except A are expected response from the fall in price and helps in explaining why the aggregate demand curve shifted ( towards the right ) . In the option B , Tyler decided to remodel his kitchen because of fall in prices, as now he is able to spend more on consumption and investment activities. Same thing is happening in option C and D as the company's here are increasing their investment spending due to the decreased prices.
But the option A , isn't something that was expected as company's don't usually fire their workers just because they have fixed price wage contract and prices have fallen, company is trying to take advantage of fallen prices by reducing the fixed wage workers and hiring new workers on a cheap wage , which help in reducing the company's cost.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": True.
Explanation:
The dissolution is the first of two steps in the termination of a partnership. It is followed by the "wind up" process where the firm ends to do business. The longer two or more companies hold a partnership, the worse the damages after the dissolution since at latter stages the firms tend to be more engaged in benefits and responsibilities.
