Arlen already established that ΔRST and ΔUTS has two pairs of congruent angles and a pair of congruent included sides, which meet the ASA Congruence Criterion. Therefore:
- the missing statement in the proof is: ΔRST ≅ ΔUTS
- the missing reason in the proof is: ASA Congruence Criterion
<h3>What is the ASA Congruence Criterion?</h3>
The ASA Congruence Criterion states that for two triangles to be considered congruent to each other, both triangles must have a pair of congruent included sides and two pairs of congruent angles.
Thus, the two-column proof that shows that RS ≅ TU that Arlen is trying to write, has already established that ΔRST and ΔUTS has the following:
Two pairs of congruent angles - ∠RST ≅ ∠UTS and ∠RTS ≅ ∠UST.
A pair of congruent included sides - ST ≅ S.
These satisfy the ASA Congruence Criterion. Therefore:
- the missing statement in the proof is: ΔRST ≅ ΔUTS
- the missing reason in the proof is: ASA Congruence Criterion
Learn more about the ASA Congruence Criterion on:
brainly.com/question/11637992
5/6 + (-1/6)
is the same as
5/6 - 1/6
- Subtract the numerators and keep the same denominators.
5/6 - 1/6 = 4/6
- Simplify 4/6 by dividing it by 2/2.
4/6 ÷ 2/2 = 2/3
<h3>Your answer is 2/3.</h3>
Answer:
The quotient is 10x +16
The remainder is 48x^2 + 2x -42 .
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
please forgive I want the points for my exam
Answer:
Yey
Step-by-step explanation:
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee