1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tom [10]
1 year ago
8

What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland S

ecurity into multiple departments? If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?
Law
1 answer:
irina [24]1 year ago
4 0

1. Richard Clarke does not have a point when he discussed breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments because what this achieves is increased departmentalization.

2. I would not split the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments.  Rather, I would split the department into operational units to manage the various threats that the United States faces while keeping the department as one.

<h3>What are the goals of the Department of Homeland Security?</h3>

The Department of Homeland Security, created after the 9/11 attacks, to strengthen the security architecture of the nation at home, has the responsibility to pursue the following security goals:

  • Prevent terrorism
  • Enhance security
  • Secure and manage U.S. borders
  • Enforce and administer U.S. immigration laws.

Under these broad goals, the Department of Homeland Security oversees the national security of the United States from numerous threats.

Some of the direct responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security include:

  • Border security
  • Aviation security
  • Countering terrorism
  • Emergency response
  • Chemical facility inspection
  • IT and cybersecurity security
  • Natural disaster planning and response.

Thus, instead of discussing splitting the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments, Richard Clarke should look at ways to strengthen and empower the department to achieve its goals.

Learn more about the Department of Homeland Security at brainly.com/question/19521614

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What is:<br> a panel interview<br> a group interview<br> a formal interview<br> a informal interview
chubhunter [2.5K]
Panel interview: a conversation with 2+ of a hiring team
a group interview: a single interviewer , interviews multiple/group of people
a formal interview: one on one interview
a informal interview: an interview that takes place in a basic place such as an interview over lunch of coffee and etc
6 0
2 years ago
What are the fundamental principles of the Faragher v. City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth cases in th
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

B. Employers are not liable for the acts of their supervisors, regardless of whether the employer is aware of the sexual harassment act.

Explanation:

In this case, the Supreme Court mentioned that an employer isat risk. That means that the empolyer does nor have a defense when sexual harassment by a supervisor involves a tangible employment action. Courts hope that employers educate supervisors so they do not commit any type of behavior that could be considered as sexual harassment. Also, all employees must be educated so as to understand their rights and responsibilities .

8 0
3 years ago
In the case of ________, the Supreme Court gave the lower courts some discretion over how they applied the test for qualified im
asambeis [7]

Answer:

Pearson v. Callahan

Explanation:

This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.

Hope this Helps!

3 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
What type of law cover specific situations for which there are not statues?
diamong [38]

Answer:

Statutory

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A defendant was on trial for having committed a murder in 1995. Taking the stand, the defendant denied being present in the city
Snezhnost [94]

This is based on who is telling the truth. The defendant denys being in the city at the time of the murder, but then a local newspaper states that he heard gunshots from inside his apartment the day of the murder (which would be impossible if he wasn't in the city at the same of the murder). There could also be a chance that the newspaper could be lying mainly because the defendant  objected that the evidence was correct. In this case, the judge should take this into consideration especially when a local newpaper article announced that the defendant heard gunshots after saying that he was never in the city. So I would say, the newspaper article could be evidence to prove that the defendant is responsible for the murder.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • People accused of crimes and awaiting trial may be released from custody if they agree to stay under house arrest. pay bail. lea
    11·2 answers
  • Help me please, i need help
    5·1 answer
  • 8. Why do all drug cases have to have the drugs analyzed before court?
    11·2 answers
  • The husband says: “I know what I’m doing. Its not my first time.” Why is his arugment a generalization?
    8·1 answer
  • What are 2 major cons about universal health care?
    13·2 answers
  • 10. According to Peel the mission of the police is to:
    7·1 answer
  • Type of law that was inapplicable to electronic transfers
    11·1 answer
  • LOOK AT THE PICTURE ATTACHED!!
    14·1 answer
  • Is restorative justice more effective than adversarial justice?
    10·1 answer
  • What are some question they asked u on the permit test?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!