1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tom [10]
1 year ago
8

What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland S

ecurity into multiple departments? If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?
Law
1 answer:
irina [24]1 year ago
4 0

1. Richard Clarke does not have a point when he discussed breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments because what this achieves is increased departmentalization.

2. I would not split the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments.  Rather, I would split the department into operational units to manage the various threats that the United States faces while keeping the department as one.

<h3>What are the goals of the Department of Homeland Security?</h3>

The Department of Homeland Security, created after the 9/11 attacks, to strengthen the security architecture of the nation at home, has the responsibility to pursue the following security goals:

  • Prevent terrorism
  • Enhance security
  • Secure and manage U.S. borders
  • Enforce and administer U.S. immigration laws.

Under these broad goals, the Department of Homeland Security oversees the national security of the United States from numerous threats.

Some of the direct responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security include:

  • Border security
  • Aviation security
  • Countering terrorism
  • Emergency response
  • Chemical facility inspection
  • IT and cybersecurity security
  • Natural disaster planning and response.

Thus, instead of discussing splitting the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments, Richard Clarke should look at ways to strengthen and empower the department to achieve its goals.

Learn more about the Department of Homeland Security at brainly.com/question/19521614

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
HELP PLZ ASAP!!!!
makkiz [27]

Answer:

Explanation:

The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.

Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.

5 0
3 years ago
. If you are experiencing fatigue, pull over and rest.<br> a.<br> true<br> b.<br> false
pentagon [3]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

it's not safe to be drowsy and fatigued behind the wheel. Many people fall asleep driving killing themselves or others. it's best to be safe and pull over.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why do white people have to sit in front of the bus but us black people had to sit in the back like that's so rude.
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

i’m white and i agree with you, there is no reason for people to be treated differently because of race

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the judicial branch?
amid [387]
Some weaknesses are the inability to control money or military, as well as not being able to act unless called for by a case. However some strengths they have are that they have the power to interpret the constitution as well as being able to shape public policy.
3 0
4 years ago
What is an allen charge? when is it applied
allsm [11]

Answer:

After deliberation, a jury reports that it is deadlocked and unable to decide on a verdict.

Explanation:

used when jurors cant decide on a verdict,  and dislodge jurors from entrenched positions

-example Allen v US 164 U.S 492 (1896)

hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to von Hetig, which category of crime victims is the most likely to be victimized?
    15·1 answer
  • Who served as the first<br>chief justice of the Supreme<br>Court​
    13·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST (multiple choice)
    12·1 answer
  • In a criminal case, the ______ plays the role of a plaintiff.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following has been used by the U.S. Congress to criminalize the production and use of medical marijuana even in sta
    11·1 answer
  • Why might it be important for those considering joining the military to understand the military legal system, even if you’re not
    5·1 answer
  • Gvfldccfklddfñdfvdfñdfñbggkmfdvdboivbc
    14·1 answer
  • Describe en que hechos de Nuestra Realidad Nacional Percibes Políticas económicas neoliberales?
    7·1 answer
  • A deposition may be taken in which phase of the lawsuit?.
    9·1 answer
  • How does the Declaration of Sentiments use ethos?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!