1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jek_recluse [69]
2 years ago
9

Which of the following statements is true regarding the regulations that govern research? The research of an international gradu

ate student enrolled at a U.S. university is not governed by U.S. regulations unless the student plans to publish the results. International research collaborations involving U.S. funded researchers are not governed by U.S. regulations when the work takes place at a private university. U.S. funded research collaborations are often governed by U.S. regulations no matter where the research takes place. International research is governed by the United Nations instead of any specific country’s regulations.
Law
2 answers:
lubasha [3.4K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

U.S. funded research collaborations are often governed by U.S. regulations no matter where the research takes place.

Explanation:

This is the statement that best describes the regulations that govern research. Research that is funded by the United States is usually governed by U.S. regulations even if the research takes place outside of the United States. This is due to the fact that the research collaborations that are funded by the United States need to follow strict standards in order to ensure that the money is well-spent and the research does not have an effect that is damaging to the place where the research is conducted.

mote1985 [20]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

U.S. Funded research collaborations are  governed by U.S. regulations even if is abroad.

Explanation:

A commun rule exist involving the regulations governing research. Marks the standards where any government-funded research in the US is held, all U.S. academic institutions hold their researchers to these statements.

You might be interested in
What does the constitution say
sineoko [7]

Answer:

It depends on what part.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Is it legal to smoke/have weed in the state of Texas?
Rashid [163]

Answer:

It is still illegal to use or possess marijuana under Texas law — and has been since 1931.

Explanation:

What changed last year is that hemp is considered different from marijuana. Since the law change, prosecutors and state crime labs have dropped hundreds of pending marijuana charges and declined to pursue new ones because they don’t have the resources to detect a substance’s precise THC content, arguably keeping them from the evidence they need to prove in court if a cannabis substance is illegal.

Gov. Greg Abbott and other state officials insisted that the bill didn’t decriminalize marijuana and that the prosecutors don’t understand the new law. Still, marijuana prosecutions in Texas plummeted by more than half in the six months after the law was enacted, according to the data from the Texas Office of Court Administration.

And medical cannabis is legal in Texas in very limited circumstances. Abbott signed the Texas Compassionate Use Act into law in 2015, allowing people with epilepsy to access cannabis oil with less than 0.5% THC. Last year, he signed House Bill 3703, which expanded the list of qualifying conditions to include diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and Lou Gehrig's disease, or ALS.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Rise to a point of order may never interrupt a speaker.<br><br><br> A. True <br> B. False
ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

wkkdjdkwlqlqp1owodkdks

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is an example of an individual bioethical decision?
Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I think it’s right

8 0
3 years ago
What could happen if the police ask your name and you refuse to tell them or give them a false name?
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

go to jail

Explanation:

If you refuse a Breathalyzer test, you will most likely face serious consequences. For instance, if an officer stops you and believes you are intoxicated, and you refuse to submit to a test to determine your blood-alcohol concentration (BAC), you may risk having your license suspended or even face jail time.

While you may not be under arrest at this point, refusing a Breathalyzer may not be such a great idea as prosecutors may still base a potential DUI/DWI charge on other evidence collected at the scene, including officer observations, witness testimony, or the results of a field sobriety test. In certain jurisdictions, your refusal may be used against you in any possible trial. And some state laws distinguish between refusing a mobile Breathalyzer (which can carry a small penalty) and refusing a post-arrest blood, urine, or breath test at a police station or hospital (which can result in more severe penalties).

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Idk if anyone will see this, but if you do, message me asap so i can get you to call 911 for me?
    13·2 answers
  • Wassup ze nice ta hear from you how r u
    7·1 answer
  • Once the House or Representatives has impeached the president, it is up to which of the selection listed below to convict and re
    8·2 answers
  • What is one thing that you believe the legal system does well?
    13·1 answer
  • URGENT 50 POINTS
    13·1 answer
  • Once you identified a potential conflict of interest,which question should you ask yourself next?
    13·2 answers
  • If you are deaf and communicate with sign language: Question 5 options: You may bring an interpreter with you to the Knowledge a
    12·1 answer
  • Suggest three ways in which womens can protect themselves against abuse​
    12·1 answer
  • Based on your reading of this section of Article 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which of the cases listed below is not a case you w
    8·1 answer
  • ***ECONOMICS***
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!