That statement is true,
By examining the sales person's facial expression you could spot which words that come out from their voice are sincere.
If the sincerity is spotted when the salesperson is asking for the problem that you have and the solution that they give, they might genuinely believes that their product might help you.
Answer:
It takes into account people's overlapping identities and experiences to understand the complexity of the prejudices they face.
In other words, the affirmative intersectional theory that people are often disadvantaged by multiple sources of oppression: their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and other markers of identity. Intersectionality recognizes that identity markers (eg, "feminine" and "black") do not exist identified by each other, and each of the information to the others, often creating a complex convergence of oppression.
Explanation:
Today, intersectionality is considered crucial for social equity work. Activists and community organizations are asking for and participating in more dynamic conversations about differences in experience between people with different overlapping identities. Without an intersectional lens, events and movements that aim to address injustice toward one group can end up perpetuating systems of inequities towards other groups. Intersectionality fully informs YW Boston's work, by encouraging nuanced conversations about inequality in Boston. It illuminates us about health disparities among women of color, provides avenues for our youth leaders to understand identity, and is crucial to the advocacy work we support.
If Ken does not account for variables such as age that could also influence one's ability to recall these events, age could be considered a "confounding variable".
A confounding variable is an outside impact that progressions the impact of a dependent and independent variable. This incidental impact is utilized to impact the result of a experimental plan. Basically, a confounding variable is an additional variable went into the condition that was not represented. confounding variables can demolish an examination and deliver futile outcomes. They propose that there are connections when there truly are definitely not.
Assuming you mean the Ottoman Empire, the Turks had a massively different mindset. The Byzantine were not religiously tolerant and they actively sought out the conversion of the Turks and other Muslim population. While the ottomans actively gave control of their own land to the Dhmiri a christian estate that payed moderate taxes for religious freedoms. Also the Byzantines had no African or Asian Ambitions like the Ottomans. The Greeks were more interested in Italy the anything else. The Ottomans on the other hand set up one of the largest transcontinental empire ever seen.<span />
