Answer:
$7073.68
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Worth of portfolio = $15,000
Amount invested in stock A = $6,000
Beta of stock A = 1.63
Beta of stock B = 0.95
Beta of portfolio = 1.10
Now,
Beta portfolio = ∑(Weight × Beta)
let the amount invested in Stock B be 'x'
thus,
1.10 = [($6,000 ÷ $15,000 ) × 1.63] + [( x ÷ $15,000 ) × 0.95 ]
or
1.10 = 0.652 + [( x ÷ $15,000 ) × 0.95 ]
or
0.448 = [( x ÷ $15,000 ) × 0.95 ]
or
x = ( 0.448 × $15,000 ) ÷ 0.95
or
x = $7073.68
Answer:
65 firms will be in the industry at the new long run equilibrium
Explanation:
in the long run the P=ATC
quantity before the change is
200 = 1000-4Q
4Q = 800
Q= 200
each firm output = Q/number of firms = 200 / 50
q = 4
new quantity is
200 = 1240-4Q
4Q = 1040
Q = 260
number of firms=new Q/q
=260/4 = 65
the number of firms is 65 in the long run.
Rising demand, increased production, increased hiring, and then rising demand again
Answer:
The payback period for Silva Inc. is 3 years. If considering only this method of evaluating projects, Silva Inc will invest in project A and dismiss project B.
Payback period A=2,1539 years.
Payback period B= 3,0042 years
Explanation:
The payback period refers to the amount of time it takes to recover the cost of an investment. The payback period is the length of time an investment reaches a breakeven point.
<u>Cash Flow A:</u>
$
I0= - 70.000
1= 28000 = -42000
2= 38000 = -4000
3= 26000 = 22000
Payback period= full years until recovery +
unrecovered cost beginning year/Cashflow during year
Payback period A= 2 + (4000/26000)= 2,1539 years.
<u>Cash Flow B:</u>
$
I0= -80000
1= 20000 = -60000
2= 23000 = -37000
3= 36000 = -1000
4= 240000 = 239000
Payback period B= 3 + 1000/240000= 3,0042 years
<u>The payback period for Silva Inc. is 3 years. If considering only this method of evaluating projects, Silva Inc will invest in project A and dismiss project B. </u>
<u></u>
C i belive im pretty sure sure.
