Answer:
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.
Explanation:
For the purpose of this Decision,
Benefit of processing further = Sales Value after processing – Sale Value before processing – Further Processing costs
Cost of acquiring trees is a sunk cost already incurred and hence is not relevant
Hence, benefit of processing = (0.80-0.20)*350 – 50
= $160
Hence, the answer is
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.
Answer:
The answer would be All of the above.
Explanation:
All the above mentioned parties are related with discharge of the chemical and are liable to get the clean up done. Marcantuone and Gieson are liable as they are the owners, Lessees of the dry cleaning establishment are liable as they are the ones who operated on the effected land and Previous owners under whose ownership the lessees had taken the land on lease for a dry cleaning property.
All the parties are liable for the clean up as well as the damage occured post the clean up as well as per the law.
<span>how would the market for smartphones be affected if the government charged an excise tax of $5.00 on each smartphone sold ?
C) The supply of smartphones would decrease.
Excise taxes are based on the quantity of an item and not on its value. For example, the federal government imposes an excise tax of 18.4 cents on every gallon of gas purchased, regardless of the price charged by the seller. States often add an additional excise tax on each gallon of fuel.
so, government will charged 5.00$ excise tax on smartphone will affected supply of smartphones would decrease.</span>
Answer:
For a company’s compensation strategy to be effective, it must be linked to the overall business strategy. Because compensation accounts for 30-60% of business costs, it is essential for organizations to identify the drivers behind pay. For this reason, the foundational step of creating any solid compensation strategy is linking it to the business strategy.
Explanation:
Answer: The answer is as follows:
Explanation:
Given that,
Raw material = $7.60/unit
Direct labor = $10.60/unit
Manufacturing overhead = $8.60/unit
(1) Unit cost under variable costing = Raw material + Direct labor + variable Manufacturing overhead
= 7.6 + 10.6 + 8.6
= 26.8
(2) Unit cost under absorption costing = Raw material + Direct labor + variable Manufacturing overhead + fixed Manufacturing overhead
= 7.6 + 10.6 + 8.6 + 8.6
= 35.4
