CHEMICAL , HOPEFULLY I HELPED YOU HON.
Answer:
Women have always worked outside the home but never before in the numbers or with the same impact as they did in World War II. Prior to the war, most of the women that did work were from the lower working classes and many of these were minorities. There were a variety of attitudes towards women in the work force. Some thought they should only have jobs that men didn’t want while others felt women should give up their jobs so unemployed men could have a job, especially during the Great Depression. Still others held the view that women from the middle class or above should never lower themselves to go to work. These and other viewpoints would be challenged with the United States’ entry into World War II.
Explanation:
After the war, women were still employed as secretaries, waitresses, or in other clerical jobs, what we often call the "pink collar" work force. Those jobs were not as well paid, and they were not as enjoyable or challenging, but women did take those jobs because they either wanted or needed to keep working.
HOPE IT HELPS.
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST.
Given the political views and inclinations of the Democratic political party, we can confirm that they would most likely support positions such as taxing the wealthy and expanding funding for education.
Based on the founding principles of the democratic party we can make the above assumption. Democratic platforms often look to:
- Support social programs and lower-income aid programs
- Establish or help labor unions
- Increase <em><u>infrastructure spending</u></em>
- Establish equal opportunity
- Expand education funding
- Increase taxes on the rich
and much more.
As can be inferred from the above list, the democratic party has traditionally been a party focused on <em><u>aiding </u></em><em><u>the </u></em><em><u>general public </u></em><em><u>and lower-income populations.</u></em> Therefore, we can make a safe assumption that these are all <u>positions </u><u>on </u><u>major issues </u><u>that a </u><u>democratic </u><u>candidate would most likely </u><u>support</u><u>.</u>
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/1204107?referrer=searchResults
Answer: C. the individuals who were relatively unprejudiced became even less prejudiced and the individuals who were relatively prejudiced became even more prejudiced.
Explanation: The scenario above could be explained using the risky or choice shift phenomenon which is a study which explains how decisions made by individuals when alone and when part of a group differs. The study shows that decisions made when individuals form part of a group often tends to be riskier than when such decision is made alone.
This is the reason why individuals who were relatively unprejudiced before the discussion became even less prejudiced after the discussion and the individuals who were relatively prejudiced before the discussion became even more prejudiced after the discussion.
This could be due to the fact that they want to be in line with other members or do not want to let them down. Or belief that shared risk decreases level of individual risk.
Explanation:
The Speaker of the House is responsible for administering the oath of office to the Members of the U.S. House of Representatives, giving Members permission to speak on the House floor, designating Members to serve as Speaker pro tempore, counting and declaring all votes, appointing Members to committees, sending bills .
