Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
SORRY BUT YOU CAN ANSWER THIS HERE YOU HAVE TO FIND A WEBSITE FOR YOUR LANGUAGE
Answer:
If the environment changes then the businesses will make products you need in that environment so consumers will buy more of that product because they need it. For example, if it's summer you need new summer clothes so companies will start to make summer clothes so people will buy them instead of winter or fall clothes because of the environment. So businesses are getting money and the consumers are getting what they need or want.
As Sarah reports to work and clocks in at 8:00 a.m. each morning and leaves at approximately 4:30 p.m she is most likely considered as an employee of the company.
An employee can be described as a person who works for an organization. An employee usually has a fixed working time just like Sarah has.
The supplies that are used for work are given by the company which is also the case for Sarah.
Each employee in an organization works under a supervisor who is answerable to the CEO. Sarah also has a supervisor who directs ad assigns her tasks.
Hence, based on these characteristics, Sarah will be considered as an employee.
To learn more about employee, click here:
brainly.com/question/27953070
#SPJ4
