Answer:
False
Explanation:
False because the income, expenses accounts are closed to profit and loss account or income summary.
they are closed by transferring the credit balances in revenue a/c and debit balnace in expenses a/c to clearing account income summary.
The assets and liabilities , common stock, equity account are not closed.
The measure of systematic risk is called <u>beta</u>.
The answer is option c.
Beta is the same old CAPM measure of systematic hazard. It gauges the tendency of the go back of protection to transport in parallel with the return of the inventory market as an entire. One manner to consider beta is as a gauge of a protection's volatility relative to the marketplace's volatility.
Systematic risk is a part of the total risk this is caused by factors beyond the control of a specific company or individual. Systematic risk is caused by elements that are outside to the organization. All investments or securities are situations to systematic hazard and, therefore, it's far a non-diversifiable chance.
To measure a monetary firm's contribution to systemic hazard includes measuring the company's expected capital shortfall in a crisis. This right away offers the regulator with a quantifiable degree of the relative significance of a firm's contribution to ordinary systemic chance.
Learn more about organization here: brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yes, you can be confident that the portfolio will not lose more than 30% of its value next year
Explanation:
In this question , the average return of portfolio is 12.5% and the standard deviation is 19.5%. It is estimated that there will be 30% loss next year. The confidence interval is 95%.
Range = Average return ± 2 x Standard deviation Low aid = 12.5% - (2 x19.5%) =12.5% -39% = -26.5%
High end = 12.5% +(2 x19.5%) =12.5%+39% = 51.5%
Thus, the low end is
26.5%
The range of return at 95% confidence interval is -26.5% to 51.5%
Dangerous working conditions and long hours of factory jobs in the 1800s
Answer:
2%
Explanation:
Based on the industry standards and regulations, an investment banking firm or a broker-dealer canvassing the agreements from limited partners in relation to a roll-up is outrightly limited to compensation of 2% of the value of the newly created securities.
Therefore, the correct answer, in this case, is that the compensation limit for this activity is pegged at 2 percent
