Answer:
Instructions are listed below
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
For the purchase option:
Buying price= $22 per unit.
For the make option:
Weekly rental payment of $30,800
The firm also has to hire five operators to help make product A. Each operator works eight hours per day, five days per week at the rate of $14 per hour.
The material cost for the make option is $15 per unit of product A.
A) We need to find the number of units that makes the unitary fixed costs= $7
Weekly rental= 30800
Direct labor= ($14*8 hours*5workes)*5 days= 2800
Total fixed costs= $33,600
Unitary fixed costs= total fixed costs/ Q
7=33600/Q
Q= 4800 units
B) Now Q= 6600
Buy= 6600*22= $145,200
Make= 6600*15 + 33600= $132,600
Answer:
There is a violation of Uniform State Law because the agent has made an offer to sell an unregistered non-exempt security in that State
Explanation:
The Uniform State Securities Law is also called blue sky law, and they are put in place at the State level to prevent fraud and to enforce security regulation.
This law was set up to handle investments that do not occur at the federal level. These are out of the purview of the SEC so states handle them.
In the given scenario the agent is trying to make a non exempt security exempt by buying it from the client.
This is an attempt to sell the securities to investors through fraudulent means and it is a violation of Uniform State Law
I think the correct answer would be politicians trading favors that do not benefit the mass populace of voters. Rent seeking is a practice that involves the use of public policy in order to get benefit from it like increasing their benefits in the expense of other. This oftentimes done by a number of politicians.
1. Illegal and unreported economic activity: While goods such as illegal drugs, gambling, and prostitution are sold in markets, the transactions are hidden for obvious reasons.
2. Home production and bartered goods/services: If cash doesn't change hands, the transaction will not be included in GDP. One of the somewhat misleading aspects of GDP is that whether certain things are included depends not on the nature of the good or service, but whether it was (openly) exchanged for cash.
Answer:
Mitigate his damages
Explanation:
By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.