Answer:
The answer is 16 years.
Explanation:
The formula for calculating the value of an investment that is compounded annually is given by:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8917/a89175379a7fc84c5e73d62ef3a8e6887b1f58ec" alt="V(n)=(1+R)^nP"
Where:
is the number of years the investment is compounded,
is the annual interest rate,
is the principal investment.
We know the following:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46d0a/46d0a868a7cbb83638dedfce90c2b04f56904a1b" alt="25000=(1+0.06)^n \times 10000"
And we want to clear the value <em>n</em> from the equation.
The problem can be resolved as follows.
<u>First step:</u> divide each member of the equation by
:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68f5e/68f5ef45a04b19faaf5561b423dc9e1d613b024d" alt="\frac{ 25000}{10000}=(1+0.06)^n \times \frac{ 10000}{10000}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f931/5f931c56c8b6ab0bbd5b748f630953c6229bc3e7" alt="2.5=(1.06)^n"
<u>Second step:</u> apply logarithms to both members of the equation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc611/cc61123e3e76b90b452dfc2b1c74a8547a714375" alt="log(2.5)=log (1.06)^n"
<u>Third step:</u> apply the logarithmic property
in the second member of the equation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24397/24397bb2a11ea22209958bc2dbcdc351a36e64b4" alt="log(2.5)=n.log (1.06)"
Fourth step: divide both members of the equation by data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11bdb/11bdbdd6ed140e65153dc8e3a30f5dc779a13c4d" alt="log1.06"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcae5/bcae56cb831afe367229ec3f528cc32e883a8651" alt="\frac{log(2.50)}{log (1.06)} =n"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e746/3e746132019cd89619d5bd7493d1d8033a2af681" alt="n= 15.7252"
We can round up the number and conclude that it will take 16 years for $10,000 invested today in bonds that pay 6% interest compounded annually, to grow to $25,000.
Yes, Bob does retain interest in this transaction as he registered under safeguard terms. because the protection clause suggest:-
A former agent is additionally obligated to the buyer registered under the protection provision in the listing agreement if the seller is shown the property by an agent within the listing term as the listing expires. The seller will still be required to pay the agent's fee if a protected buyer tries to make a direct purchase from them while the protection period is still in effect.
<h3><u>What is the purpose of a protection clause?</u></h3>
- A safety protection provision is intended to guarantee that a broker gets paid fairly for their services and to prohibit buyers' and sellers' collusion.
- A contingency known as a broker protection clause, sometimes known as a safety clause or extension clause, is present in listing agent contracts. This provision states that in some circumstances, even if the house sells after their listing has expired, the seller will pay the listing agent commission fees.
To know more about protection clause, check the given links.
brainly.com/question/25079139
brainly.com/question/2252772
#SPJ4
Answer:
the options are missing, so I looked for them:
a. The buying of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
c. The selling of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
d. The buying of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
the answer is:
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
Explanation:
The crowding out effect happens when the government increases its spending level in order to engage in an expansionary fiscal policy but someone needs to pay for this extra spending. In order for the government to finance their spending, they have to choose to either increase taxes or issue more debt. When they issue more debt, they end up decreasing private investment since money that could be used by private companies is used by the government instead.
<span>By renting a home instead of purchasing one, you are paying someone else's mortgage every month and getting nothing in return. While you are gaining a home to live in for the short term, in the long term you will gain nothing. When you purchase a home you will have a home that you own and that you cannot be evicted from as long as you pay your mortgage.</span>