Answer:
the firm's contribution margin per composite unit is $8,775
Explanation:
The computation of the firm's contribution margin per composite unit is given below:
= $165 × 5 + $510 × 9 + $560 × 6
= $825 + $4,590 + $3,360
= $8,775
Hence, the firm's contribution margin per composite unit is $8,775
Therefore the same is to be considered and relevant
Answer:
a. 24%
b. 12%
Explanation:
Marginal tax rate is an incremental tax rate that is paid out of the taxable income of a tax payer. It represents the rate at which the last unit of dollar of the taxable income is taxed. The marginal rate for each income bracket is supplied by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Chuck Marginal Tax Rate
a) The marginal tax rate for Chuck if he earns additional $40,000 taxable income will be:
= $75,000 + $40,000
= $115,000
Marginal tax rate for $115,000 is 24% according IRS tax rate schedule.
b) If instead, it is an additional deduction of $40,0000, the marginal tax rate will be:
= $75,000 - $40,000
= $35,000
The marginal tax rate for taxable income of $35,000 is 12% according US tax rate schedule.
Note: the interest is categorized as interest from municipal bond, so it is tax free.
It is also assumed that Chuck is single. Hence, tax rate under single filer applies to him.
Answer:
The gross domestic product
Explanation:
The gross domestic product = Consumption spending + Investment + Government Spending + Net Export
Answer:
$33,630
Explanation:
Given that the company's collection history shows that 43% of credit sales are collected in month of sale and the remainder (57%) is collected in the following month then, in the month of January, Cash collections in January from December credit sales would be equivalent to 57% of December Credit sales. Using the actual figures,
Cash collections in January from December credit sales would be
= 57% * 59,000
= $33,630
Answer: No, this was merely Carl's opinion.
Explanation:
Labelling a statement as an opinion generally protects the person who said it from defamation suits however this is not always the case.
If the opinion is based on disclosed and well known facts, the action is free of defamatory or libel charges.
This seems to be the case in this scenario as his column seems to be based on the performances for the year.
Bottomline is, Stella cannot sue Carl for libel as it is his opinion.