<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct two responses would be that massive amounts of resources were taken away from other economic sectors, and that the government failed to properly "guess" the proper production quotas. </span></span>
The reaction of President Johnson to the Gulf of Tonkin incident did indeed show a monolithic view of Communism because he believed that Communism was dangerous.
<h3>What was the Gulf of Tonkin incident?</h3>
This was an event in 1964 when it was said that North Vietnamese navy boats attacked American naval destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin.
The North Vietnamese were Communists and Johnson responded by increasing U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.
This shows a rigid view of Communism because Johnson thought that it would be right to go after Communists in Vietnam because all Communists were dangerous.
Find out more on the Gulf of Tonkin incident at brainly.com/question/15593184.
#SPJ1
Hmmm I think the state executive officers.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
bcz there was disruption just like the acts of (the Red Army Faction), but West Germany had a stable government where various political parties have been able to take part on national issues. Just like other countries the political trends vary depending on which party governs the government.
