Answer:
".spammmm sorry I just need pointsss"
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
As every single presidential term in the United States, Jimmy Carter had his ups and downs, positives and negatives.
Among the positive things, Carter opposed racial segregation, supported civil rights movements, established the Department of Education and the Department of Energy, supported legislation to conserve energy in the country, played a key role in the Camp David Accords to establish peace in the Middle East, and supported the signing of SALT II, as well as to give the operation of the Panama Canal to Panama´s government.
On the negative side, one of his first decisions that resulted controversially was to pardon the draft evaders of the Vietnam War. A decision that was questioned by many. He found it difficult to deal with stagflation, high unemployment rates, limited economic growth, he had to deal with the energy crisis at the end of his presidency, and also with the Iran hostage crisis. And one of the tensest moments, the Soviet Union invasion of Afghanistan.
Answer:
a. south korea has more private business than india and china
Explanation:
South Korea is an advanced, market-oriented economy, with a GDP Per capita of over 30,000 dollars, much higher than India's or China's.
Even if the South Korea economy has very strong conglomerates like Samsung and Hyundai (they are called chaebol in South Korea), medium and small private businesses are the backbone of the country, like in any other advanced, market-oriented economy.
China does not have as many private businesses (proportionally) because it is not as populated, and because the government controls a larger part of the economy. In India, the economy is a lot poorer, and this makes it harder for private businesses to succeed.
Their is no flexable glass its not possible
Answer:
In literary and historical analysis, presentism is the anachronistic introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past. Modern historians seek to avoid presentism in their work because they consider it a form of cultural bias, and believe it creates a distorted understanding of their subject matter.[1] The practice of presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past.
