Ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
False. According to the World Health Organization, any kind of action resulting physical harm or damage, and also any kind of psychological harm, damage and even maldevelopment of an individual can be construed as violence.
Divide 61.5 by three so you know how much each quarter is.
61.5/3=20.5
And then add that number to 61.5 so that you have all four quarters
20.5+61.5=82
So he only has 20.5 miles more to get home and he will have traveled 82 miles in all when he gets home.
Answer:
in the sixth century B.C., when the writer Epimenides lived, there was a plague which went all through all Greece. The Greeks felt that they more likely than not outraged one of their divine beings, so they started offering penances on raised areas to all their different bogus divine beings. When nothing worked they figured there should be a Divine being who they didn't think about whom they should by one way or another appease. So Epimenides thought of an arrangement. He delivered hungry sheep into the open country and educated men to follow the sheep to see where they would rests.
He accepted that since hungry sheep would not normally rests yet keep on touching, if the sheep were to rests it would be a sign from God that this spot was consecrated. At each spot, where the sheep tired and layed down, the Athenians constructed a special raised area and relinquished the sheep on it. A while later it is accepted the plague halted which they credited to this Unknown God tolerating the penance.
Explanation:
The Unknown God or Agnostos Theos is a Divine being referenced by the Christian Missionary Paul Areopagus discourse in Acts 17:23, that notwithstanding the twelve primary divine beings and the countless lesser gods, old Greeks loved a god they called "Agnostos Theos"; that is: "The Unknown God", which Norden called "Un-Greek". In Athens, there was a sanctuary explicitly committed to that god and regularly Athenians would swear "for the sake of The Unknown God"
The United States involvement in the recent events in Rwanda can best be described as intervention. Involvement at all rules out isolation and diplomacy exists as synonymous to international affairs. The actions wouldn't be imperialistic because the US isn't trying to take control of Rwandan affairs thus it must be intervention - a direct involvement in an effort to allow the nation to conduct its own affairs.