The most important subject for (their,<u> them</u>) was how to plant
<h2>Noun and Pronoun :</h2>
By definition, a noun is just defined as a name of a person, animal, place or things. Example of nouns included Peter, Paul, Sophia, Cat, Table, New York, Texas, e.t.c
Now,a Pronoun may be a subcategory of nouns and it is simply a word that can replace a noun to avoid repetition. for instance , rather than calling someone by his name like Peter, you'll say;
Peter wants to return but "he" said he is tired. So we see that the word he has replaced Peter to avoid repetition.
Learn more about noun and pronoun :
brainly.com/question/17392892
#SPJ4
The line of the poem that shows how the speaker wants to change the world is "That all these walls oppression builds / Will have to go!" (Lines 9-10), as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The speaker shows how the walls are making him uncomfortable.
- This oppresses him and it is an oppression that increases upon him with great influence.
- He realizes that this is not a bad thing and that something must be done to change this situation.
- For that reason, he decides to get up and go to where he can change that situation.
In this case, we can see that the speaker believes that to change the situation in the world, he needs to get up and do something and not wait for someone to solve it.
More information on how to make changes to the link:
brainly.com/question/5952035
The answer maybe B hopefully it’s right sorrry!!
He relies on experience and is too focused on senses. Plato says the senses are very unreliable.
Aristotle suggests that the morally weak are usually young persons who lack the habituation to virtue that brings the passions of the soul under the internal control of reason. According to Aristotle, like sleepy, mad or drunken persons who can “repeat geometrical demonstrations and verses of Empedocles,” and like an actor speaking their lines, “beginning students can reel off the words they have heard, but they do not yet know the subject” (NE 1147a19-21). A young person, therefore, can “repeat the formulae (of moral knowledge),” which they don‟t yet feel (NE 1147a23). Rather, in order to retain knowledge when in the grip of strong passions, Aristotle asserts that, “the subject must grow to be part of them, and that takes time” (NE 1147a22). Avoiding moral weakness, therefore, requires that we take moral knowledge into our souls and let it become part of our character. This internalization process the young have not had time to complete.
If moral weakness is characteristic of the young who have not yet taken moral knowledge into their souls, thereby allowing them to temporarily forget or lose their knowledge when overcome by desire in the act of moral weakness, it would seem that Aristotle‟s account of moral weakness does not in fact contradict Socrates‟ teaching that no one voluntarily does what they “know” to be wrong. Virtue does in fact seem to be knowledge, and, as Aristotle asserts, “we seem to be led to the conclusion which Socrates sought to establish. Moral weakness does not occur in the presence of knowledge in the strict sense”
im not sure of all of these but heres what i can help with
a-2 c-1
sorry i couldnt be more helpful
