Answer:
"Confidentiality" is the right answer.
Explanation:
- This corresponds to something like a guarantee that perhaps the amount of knowledge gathered from the study would not be disseminated to anybody other than studying respondents.
- Though because its purpose is somehow to remain to stand and therefore any willing individual research or surveys to find out anyway knowledge is deliberately hidden or stored.
Need more info to answer this question
Council-manager system is a form of city government with an elected city council and a hired professional who oversees day-to-day operations.
In council-manager authorities, an elected city council serves as the town's number one legislative frame and appoints a major executive officer known as a city manager to oversee day after day municipal operations to draft a price range, and implement and put in force the council's policy and legislative tasks.
The council-manager form is the device of nearby authorities that mixes the strong political management of elected officials inside the shape of a council or other governing body, with the robust managerial revel in of an appointed neighborhood government manager.
The Council-manager form encourages open communication among citizens and their authorities. In this form, each member of the governing frame has an equal voice in coverage improvement and administrative oversight.
Learn more about council-manager here brainly.com/question/2316302
#SPJ4
Answer:
According to Edwin Lemert, <u>secondary</u> deviance occurs when social reaction intensifies with each act of primary deviance, and the offender becomes stigmatized, accepting the truth of the label.
Explanation:
Edwin Lemert in 1951 stated that secondary deviance is the process of a deviant identity, integrating it into conceptions of self, potentially affecting the individual long term.
Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:
(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />
- The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.
- Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.
- He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.
- Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."
- In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.
Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:
brainly.com/question/1755400