Question

Research a criminal case that was resolved through plea bargaining, and explain the facts of the case. Weighing the evidence and the alleged offense, write about what you would have done if you were the defendant. Also, analyze and discuss your thoughts on the benefits and drawbacks of plea bargains.

Answer 1

A criminal case that was resolved through plea bargaining was the Bradshaw v. Stumpf (2005)

If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf ,  in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.

The benefits of plea bargains are:

• It gives soft justice for those who are found guilty.

• It helps to remove criminals off the streets

The drawbacks of plea bargains.

• It can put innocent people into prison for false reasons.
• It alters the efficiency of the criminal justice system.

What was the Bradshaw v. Stumpf case?

In the case,"

The  court was said to have concluded that Stumpf  is one that has pleaded guilty to aggravated murder without knowing  that particular intent to cause death.

Hence, If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf  ,  in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.

Learn more about plea bargaining from

brainly.com/question/19557127

#SPJ1