A criminal case that was resolved through plea bargaining was the Bradshaw v. Stumpf (2005)
If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf , in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.
The benefits of plea bargains are:
- It gives soft justice for those who are found guilty.
- It helps to remove criminals off the streets
The drawbacks of plea bargains.
- It can put innocent people into prison for false reasons.
- It alters the efficiency of the criminal justice system.
<h3>What was the Bradshaw v. Stumpf case?</h3>
In the case,"
The court was said to have concluded that Stumpf is one that has pleaded guilty to aggravated murder without knowing that particular intent to cause death.
Hence, If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf , in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.
Learn more about plea bargaining from
brainly.com/question/19557127
#SPJ1
