Answer: Students have the right to refuse to participate in this study.
Explanation: From this scenario, the most appropriate statement is that students have the right to refuse to participate in the study. This is because the research project is a personal project by the instructor, which is not a prerequisite for passing the course introductory Psychology. Simply because the instructor made it a part of the course, the students have the right to refuse participation.
Everyone was kind of doing their own thing at the time- making decisions they'd regret and abiding by what they thought was right. Eventually, the men who wrote the constitution, including James Maddison and Thomas Jefferson, thought it was a time for change and more of a constructed nation which helped them to come along the idea of writing the constitution. They figured if the rules were put into place and were to be followed, then the civilization of America would be more of a healthier environment to live in, verbally and physically.
Answer: In the lane you’re about to enter
Explanation:
In contrast, expert testimony is admissible only if the witness "qualifies as an expert by virtue of knowledge, skill, experience, education or training" and the testimony provided meets four requirements: increase. Knowledge helps those who know the facts to understand them.
The subject matter of the testimony must be related to the issue at issue. - The usefulness of the testimony outweighs the ill effects it can have.
In the common law system, an expert opinion is usually provided by one of the parties. Evidence must be credible, relevant to the case, conclusive rather than conclusive, and permissible for fact-checking. A fact-finder determines how much weight is given to testimony.
Learn more about testimony at
brainly.com/question/4214423
#SPJ4
Answer:
Discrimination....actually the type of discrimination used was direct discrimination
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
