Julia helps the poor performers of her team understand the ways in which they are hurting organizational performance.
The answer is option A.
The senior manager is accountable for planning and directing the paintings of a group of individuals. They monitor their paintings and take corrective moves while essential. Senior managers may manual employees directly or they could direct numerous supervisors, who in turn directly manipulate the employees.
The second level (or third-degree now and again in large agencies) is a senior supervisor. The responsibilities of a senior manager are basically the same as those of a supervisor. They're liable for the administrative and functional path of a collection of personnel.
Learn more about senior manager here: brainly.com/question/24553900
#SPJ4
<em />
<em>Your question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.</em>
You are a senior manager who needs to evaluate five supervisors in your department. Which of the following supervisors will you decide is the most effective at delivering performance reviews?
a) Julia helps the poor performers of her team understand the ways in which they are hurting organizational performance.
b) Adrianne procrastinates delivering negative feedback when she sees that employees are defensive.
c) Jorge discusses what he believes employees are thinking rather than their concrete actions.
d) Derek uses an accusatory tone while delivering a negative performance review.
e) Rita sugarcoats the description of problem behaviors while delivering a negative performance review.
I believe the answer is: <span>self-fulfilling prophecy
</span><span>self-fulfilling prophecy refers to the prediction that indirectly become true due to the influence of believe/behavior.
</span>In the scenario above, the speaker might have to consider whether the hostile attitude that he give to the other person is actually the reason why that person behave negatively and start to cut corners.
B ) a decrease in the supply of consumer goods
It depends on the mindset and situation, odds are they won't be too excited at first. I was happy though.
Answer:
King Philip II of Spain was, personality-wise, less cautious than Elizabeth I of England. He sought a more active foreign policy, in part because he had to, since he was not only a king, but the emperor of a huge Spanish Empire that included territories all over the world.
King Philip was a devout catholic who saw himself as a defender of the Pope, and as a leader of the counter-reformation. His anti-protestanism was one of his motivations for invading England in 1588.
Elizabeth I was more reserved, in part because he did not have as much power as Philip II. She was the king of a small island-country, not the empress of a transoceanic empire. She was relatively tolerant of other religiouns while being anglican herself.
She did not had a lot military success until the Anglo-English war when her army defeated the Spanish Armada.
