Answer:
The memory was unforgettable
Answer:
1. a) that is a good idea!
2. b) i think so too
3. b) yes, i use it every day
4. c) almost every day
5. b) i don't think so
6. a) you are right
Explanation:
1. b) is vague; c) is not an appropriate reply since it does not make any sense in the context of the conversation
2. a) is vague since it does not give a proper "yes/no" reply; c) is also vague as it does not clearly explain what 'it' refers to
3. a) "we go" does not make sense since artificial intelligence is not a place; c) is a question
4. a) does not answer the question; b) is an illogical answer because most people often use the internet
5. a) is vague and does not provide a proper answer; c) is also vague
6. b) is a question; c) does not agree or disagree with the original statement
i hope this helps! :D
Despite the lack of a passage in this question, it is still possible to identify the option containing a subject of <em>ridicule.</em>
The correct answer is: Squealer calls the other animals ignorant.
"To ridicule" means to perform an action that undermines the reputation of someone or something in order to make them/it seem foolish. This is accomplished in the sentence as the subject, Squealer, humiliates the object, the other animals, by calling them "ignorant".
<u>The correct answer is A. What proof the tipster is able to provide.</u>
The reason why it's anonymous is probably because <em>the person providing the information doesn't feel comfortable providing their identity</em>. That's why we have so many tip lines that assure us we won't be asked for our names, information about where we live or even how we know what we know. All they care about is the information we provide and the accuracy of it.
Hence the correct answer can't be C or D. Just imagine what would happen to the tipster if they are quoted or exposed. They want the crime to stop but they don't want to be harmed for being the people talking about it.
In order to stop the crime or expose it, it is<u><em> necessary</em></u> for the reporter to have <em>concrete evidence</em> of it. Without proof, the reporter won't be able to check if the tip is true. His reputation is also undermined if what he publishes turns out to be fake, so proof is very important.
Answer B it's also incorrect because the <em>intention </em>of the tipster should be <em>irrelevant</em>. Also by stating why they want to talk, they'd be revealing who they are to the criminals (or at least give them an idea) and they wouldn't remain anonymous anymore.
