Having a lot of resources firstly greatly affects how you will lead your battles, where you will lead them and how much thought you will put into preparing and creating a strategy for a certain battle. So in any battle, the more resources and the better strategy that one nation/one side in a war had, the better was probably their outcome as well.
In essence, strategies helped both sides in any war to prepare for what the enemy would bring at them. With resources, they were able to utiilize these strategies and try to win a battle/the war.
In 1994, about 1 million people were massacred due to ethnic tension in RWANDA
This event was known as Rwanda Genocide. This is where Hutu extremists killed off around 800,000 women, men, and children. 75% of which are the Tutsi, an ethic group, whom Hutu extremists blamed as the reason for the country's increasing social, economic, and political pressures. The remaining 25% of the murdered masses was either part of the Twa ethnic group or other Hutu, those who are against the killing campaign and the forces directing it. It was estimated that 200,000 people participated in the perpetration of the Rwandan genocide.
Answer:
They fought for freedom.
Explanation:
Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They decided to require several kinds of taxes from the colonists to help pay for the French and Indian War. These taxes included the Stamp Act, passed in 1765, which required the use of special paper bearing an embossed tax stamp for all legal documents.
Answer:
the colonies needed enslaved Africans because they killed off the indian and they don't know anything about planting things so they went to Africa where there is people that know how to do things.
Explanation:
Answer: He planned his movement with strategies so he would'nt lose all his troops in the war.
Explanation:
