<u><em>Native Americans</em></u> and <u><em>Europeans</em></u> were great explorers in the 1490's. <em>Europeans</em> adventurers came to a continent that was an unknown place to them. They saw it as an entirely new territory, with new species to discover. They met new people with surprising ways of living and a totally new culture and beliefs. <u><em>Native Americans</em></u> also arrived at different times, over several thousands of years. They traveled from Asia on foot or by boat, crossing the Bering Strait. Their explorations took them through icy landscapes, deserts, forests, swamps and along the coastlines. After some time, these <u><em>native American</em></u> explorers spread out over the entire continent, until the territories of Patagonia, in the extreme south. Adventure and conquest of new land was one characteristic that <em><u>Europeans</u></em> and <u><em>native Americans</em></u> had in common at that time.
Expansionary and contractionary policies can be used to encourage or discourage economic growth. Expansionary policies generally lower taxes and give consumers and producers additional money, which encourages spending and growth. This is done when unemployment is high. On the other hand, contractionary policies generally raise taxes, which can give consumers and producers less to spend. This can cause less economic growth, but is necessary when the economy is growing too quickly and inflation is rising.
the difference between expansionary policy and contractionary policy
expansionary policies are used to stimulate the economy and reduce unemployment
<span>contractionary polices are used to reduce economic growth and combat inflation</span><span>
</span>
I read a book series on this subject and I'm pretty sure its D. All of the above. Because many African Americans were indeed looking for job opportunities instead of being slaves and working on plantations, would face rarely any harsh racism there, and well the government didn't exactly help but there was many operations aiding the move.
