Answer:
By offering different perspective.
Explanation:
Popular historical events, tend to be written from the perspective of the 'Winners'. Even if those winners were doing something unethical during the events, they can cover it by justifying their actions through some sort of divine will or missions.
The perspective from non-European histories offered a different perspective on the colonization.
In the past, colonization's were generally praised as something good. The Europeans masked it as some sort of mission to help other countries in the world improve their civilization. But, they didn't mention the dark side of it. Only after examining non-European histories the world aware of the human exploitation, resources exploitation, and the military's conflicts that's caused by the colonization.
By providing food and resources perhaps
Thomas Paine says that the colonies need to stop being afraid of the British and fight back for independence
Americans started to hate the war (woo go peace core) and eventually we left Vietnam and Johnson didn't try his luck for getting his second term lol
Answer: lack of authority to enforce laws
Explanation:
during Reconstruction the Freedmen's Bureau was heavily supported by African-Americans. This was because this federal agency helped in aiding African-Americans with job opportunities and other services. This shows that statement one is incorrect.
