Answer:
Explanation:
I think its going to be A im not sure
Answer:
Explanation:
As the stories are passed down they are probably details that are added or lost. Also, everyone is different so people experience and see things differently over the course of time. Along with the discovery of new perspectives and evidence
They argued about ratification and how many states would need to agree for the Constitution to take effect is the answer that summarizes the main argument between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the Constitutional Convention. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option.
They had naval superiority. This meant they could form naval blockades to keep the central powers from getting supplies in and out. A disadvantage would be that France, Russia, and Britain were separated. Because of this, they could not supply each other.
The correct answer is B) <span> It can rule laws unconstitutional that violate rights protected in the Constitution.
</span>
