I think it's C i'm sorry if i'm wrong.
<span>the Amu Dar'ya is your answer i am 100 percent positive that this is the right answer
</span>
Flooding because of dam failures, subsidence, etc. are secondary effects, whereas shaking of structures, liquefaction, etc. by faulting are direct damage.
<h3>What are secondary catastrophic effects?</h3>
Secondary effects are indirectly associated with the occurrence of a catastrophic event (in this case, a earthquake).
Moreover, direct damage makes reference to eventual immediate effects that such catastrophic events may have.
In conclusion, flooding because of dam failures, subsidence, etc. are secondary effects, whereas shaking of structures, liquefaction, etc. by faulting are direct damage.
Learn more about immediate catastrophic effects here:
brainly.com/question/7413514
#SPJ1
Answer: A
Explanation:
It does have a high frequency of tornadoes and storms and is also surrounded by water which makes theses accourances more likely to happen!
No there equally the same
