The answer is:
The following options benefit African consumers but not African farmers.
I. Subsidies to keep crop prices low
IV. Availability of imported grains
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>If you were to subsidize to keep prices low, consumers would benefit exclusively because the would pay a fixed rate for their farm products. On the other hand farmers would be affected because we don't know many factors that would influence this decission. Some of these factors may be.</em>
<em>- Will there be a price fixed for certain products</em>
<em>- Will the grains be cash crops</em>
<em>- Will farmers be allowed to rotate crops</em>
<em>Without knowing these factors one can only assume that when you susidize a crop the conditions imposed on the farmers may or may not be ideal.</em>
<em>When it comes to the availability of imported grains, some of these grains may be even cheaper than local grains. This may have a negative effect on local farmers who cannot lower their prices at a loss. Consumers would definitely benefit by paying lower prices from imported crops.</em>
Answer:
They believed that the Constitution was a strict document that clearly limited the powers of the federal government
The end of the Peloponnesian War was when the 421 Truce treaty signed
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
In 1917 president Wilson declared war against germany, in order to ensure that democracy survived worldwide. However, there were imminent threats in the US homefront. Germany agreed to help Mexico retaxe the land it lost in the American- Mexican war, as well as the war of 1812 and the Spanish- American war. So congress passed an act that reinstated the draft. More than four million men were consequently enlisted in the war.
