Answer:
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Sales 362 237 192 134 100
Cost of goods sold 365 238 195 135 100
Accounts receivable 254 202 191 114 100
Explanation:
Note: See the attached excel file for the table showing how the trend percents are calculated.
Trend percents, often known as index numbers, can be described as percents that are used for comparing financial data across time to a based year or period. This can be calculated using the following formula:
Trend percents = (Analysis year amount / Base year amount) * 100 ........ (1)
Using equation (1), the following table shows the trend percents computed as follows:
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Sales 362 237 192 134 100
Cost of goods sold 365 238 195 135 100
Accounts receivable 254 202 191 114 100
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
In an interview for a job, there is no specific rule to be followed that an interviewee must follow. An interview is a perfect time to get to know more about the company's needs and also to advertise yourself.
But in case the job is no something that you like, then you must call the interviewer back and thank them for their time and also tell them the reason for the job rejection. Moreover, it is unethical to abruptly decline any job offer. Also, rejecting a job during the interview is not a standard procedure, for it will only make you seem more unethical and disrespectful.
Therefore, <u>it is not true that rejecting a job on the spot during an interview is a standard procedure.</u>
Answer:
orange juice 0.80 dollar
Bagel 1 dollar
coffe 0.60 dollar
Explanation:
We construct the equation system:
We subtract one from another to get an expression without C:
1.5A+1.2B+C - (A+B+C) = 3 - 2.40
0.5A + 0.2B = 0.6
Then, we solve in the first part to express B as an expression of A
considering the coffe is worth half of the new cost of A
C = 1.5A / 2 = 0.75A
A + B + C = 2.40
A + B + 0.75A = 2.40
B = 2.40 - 1.75A
And now we replace in the other expression to get A:
0.5A + 0.2(2.40 - 1.75A) = 0.6
0.5A - 0.35A + 0.48 = 0.60
0.15A = 0.12
A = 0.12/0.15 = 0.8
Now we solve for C:
C = 0.75A = 0.6
Last, for B:
A + B + C = 2.40
0.8 + B + 0.6 = 2.40
B = 2.40 - 0.8 - 0.6 = 1
Answer:
C. Anchoring
Explanation:
The first price to be mentioned will have an effect on the perception of all future prices. If we start with $200, then $100 will seem cheap, but £1000 seem expensive. But if we start with $10, then $100 will seem expensive.
The anchor for a price perception may be found in the first price mentioned. It can also arrive in the mind of the purchaser, where the anchor may have been set by previous experience.
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
