Past form means it happened in the past.
Breaking means it is happening now (present tense) and is incorrect.
Broken is an adjective not a verb and is therefore incorrect.
Broke is the correct choice because it is past tense. Think, if you said, "I broke the chair" it means you broke it in the past, not in the present or future.
Breaked is not a word.
It is plot. resolution and denouement mean the same thing, and they are a piece of the plot, and theme is the subject of a piece of writing.
please mark me as brainliest and rate ,thank me please i begg you
Explanation:
The Theory of Hormheb
The king’s deputy, also known as Horemheb, may have also been responsible for the death of King Tut as well. The possibility that King Tut was getting older and probably ready to take powers into his own hands may have contributed to his early demise. For many years it was believed that Hormheb guided King Tut in his royal decisions as a child. As King Tut grew older and became more independent he started making his own decisions without the aid of Horemheb. This new thinking might have upset him and he quickly saw his power fading away. This independence that King Tut was attaining might have upset him and could been the reason as to why he killed King Tut.
Though Horemheb did not get the throne after King Tut’s death he did get it after Ay. Upon becoming the pharaoh he restored Egypt to its traditional tradition which was the worshiping of the many ancient gods. He moved his capital to Memphis and returned all the temples to their rightful priests. During his reign as pharaoh he removed any signs of Akhenaten’s religion.
By his actions, many Egyptologists and historians strongly assume that Horemheb wanted to restore Egypt to its traditional ways. Although, in hindsight, it appears that King Tut was also leaning in the direction of restoring Egypt to the more habitual ways before his death—it might not have been fast enough for Horemheb though.
Mohamed El-Saghir, head of Upper Egyptian Antiquities, believes that Horemheb could not have committed the murder of the pharaoh. Mohamed believes that because King Tut was restoring Egypt to its traditional ways, Horemheb would not have had any reason to kill him. He does find it interesting that Horemheb removed King Tut’s name from several items and replaced it with his. Even so, it’s still not enough evidence and most pharaohs always tried to outdo the pharaohs before them.
Answer:
a) Simile
Explanation:
Because it is comparing using as
"slaves know as little of their ages AS horses know of theirs"
Well, you may want to find out about them before answering the questions. Reading about them gives you an idea on the questions you want to ask.
I hoped I helped and if you need more you can always ask me :)
-Dawn
(thanks for answering my question)
