To solve this problem you must apply the proccedure below:
1. Let's call:
x: hot dogs.
y: hamburguers.
2. Then, you must make a system of equations, as below:
5x+4y=12.25 (i)
4x+5y=12.50 (ii)
3. Now, you can solve the system of equation as below:
5x+4y=12.25
x=(12.25-4y)/5
4x+5y=12.50
4((12.25-4y)/5)+5y=12.50
y=1.5
4x+5y=12.50
4x+5(1.5)=12.50
x=1.25
4. Therefore, the answer is:
The cost of one hot dog is $1.25 and the cost of one hamburguer is $1.50
Answer: Phillip is correct. The triangles are <u>not </u>congruent.
How do we know this? Because triangle ABC has the 15 inch side between the two angles 50 and 60 degrees. The other triangle must have the same set up (just with different letters XYZ). This isn't the case. The 15 inch side for triangle XYZ is between the 50 and 70 degree angle.
This mismatch means we cannot use the "S" in the ASA or AAS simply because we don't have a proper corresponding pair of sides. If we knew AB, BC, XZ or YZ, then we might be able to use ASA or AAS.
At this point, there isn't enough information. So that means John and Mary are incorrect, leaving Phillip to be correct by default.
Note: Phillip may be wrong and the triangles could be congruent, but again, we don't have enough info. If there was an answer choice simply saying "there isn't enough info to say either if the triangles are congruent or not", then this would be the best answer. Unfortunately, it looks like this answer is missing. So what I bolded above is the next best thing.
Answer: b) τ = 0.3
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the data :
Amount of salt (x)____% body fat(y)
0.2 _______________20
0.3 _______________30
0.4 _______________22
0.5 _______________30
0.7 _______________38
0.9 _______________23
1.1 ________________30
The correlation Coefficient as obtained from the online pearson correlation Coefficient calculator is 0.3281 = 0.3 (to one decimal place) which implies that a weak positive correlation or relationship exists between the preferred amount of salt taken to the percentage body weight of an individual. This is because the value is positive and closer to 0 than 1. The closer the weaker the degree of correlation. With positive values implying a positive relationship (that is an increase in variable A leads to a corresponding increase in B and vice-versa).
Answer:
12 months or a year
Step-by-step explanation:
300÷25=12
