1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
german
3 years ago
11

What are three supporting details about why U.S. Intervention in the boxer rebellion was a problem?

History
1 answer:
lana66690 [7]3 years ago
5 0

The U.S intervention in the boxer rebellion was a problem for three main reasons:

  1. Americans in China were taking advantage of China's culture and resources.
  2. The Chinese people lost independence since Americans wanted to show other nations that they were superior to China by introducing them to other traditions, religion and products that changed their own.
  3. During the rebellion, there was a great number of Americans in the country.  
You might be interested in
1. The two major river systems of China are the<br>and the​
Setler79 [48]

Answer: the yellow river and the yangtze river

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drag each tile to the correct box.
Virty [35]

Answer:

male citizens= the most important group...

women= had no rights, couldn't own property, couldn't take part in government

metics= free people but not citizens

slaves= lowest class of people in athens

good luck

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What problem is the cartoon meant to highlight? the monopolies created by large corporations the corruption of government by mon
storchak [24]

Hey just to let you know we would need the cartoon in order to answer correctly or it makes no sense okay?

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the panama canal benefit u.s. trade
Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

the answer would be D tho,

Explanation:

Before the Panama Canal was completed in 1941, the only way to trade was to sail around Cape Horn in South America which was a 13,000 mile trip and it took about 3-6 months. It was a rough journey with seasickness, and treacherous waters. However, once the Panama Canal was completed, the distance was cut by almost half to 5200 miles and the time of journey down to about a month.  

   Because of the Canal, the U.S. was able to ship  supplies so much faster. The faster a country can ship, the more willing they are to trade. They are willing to trade more because they don't have to spend so much money on fuel.   Because they spend less money on fuel, they can carry more supplies. Now most all the money the U.S. gets from trade is through the Panama Canal. If you are confused, here is an example of how it works. If England were selling products to Peru, England's economy would suffer if the Canal were not operating. Without access to the Canal, the cost of exports from England to Peru would significantly increase because England would have to regain the added expenses involved in sailing around South America. Because of increased prices, Peru could not afford to purchase as many products from England, which in turn would decrease England's revenues gained from exports. Decreased revenues means that England would have less money available to purchase products from the United States and other countries. A "domino effect" would be set in motion as the United States and other countries experienced similar problems with their exports and imports.

   America prospers from the same example. If San Fransisco wanted to make trade with New York, and they were trading perishable food items, the three month voyage (without the canal) would spoil the food. But with the Panama Canal the one month voyage would keep the goods perfectly ripe and ready for trade.

Hope this helps

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Alexander hamilton believed the legal reasoning behind a national bank fit under what part of the us constitution?.
dem82 [27]

Hamilton thought that the Constitution's Article I Section 8, which grants the Congress the ability to enact laws that are appropriate and necessary for the government, gave Congress the authority to establish a national bank.

James Madison, a representative from Virginia, and Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson disagreed, arguing that the states owned any authority that the Constitution did not expressly provide to Congress. Nevertheless, the bank measure easily passed the House with a vote of 39 to 20, and on February 25, 1791, President George Washington signed it into law. Congress allowed the bank's charter to expire 20 years later. Representative James Madison of Virginia fought for the Constitution's Bill of Rights while he was serving in the House.

Learn more about to Hamilton  visit here;

brainly.com/question/12074319

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Why have so many large new hotels being built in bangkok?
    10·1 answer
  • The delegates had differing views on how powerful the national government should be. What did delegates for a strong national go
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following promises made in the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 were NOT kept by the United States government in the ens
    10·2 answers
  • "It is against all reason to suppose that this content can long remain subject to any external power" this argument was stated b
    5·1 answer
  • What steps did Diocletian take to restore order and reform the empire
    8·1 answer
  • Which TruForm measure could vote is used to approve an amendment to the state constitution
    7·1 answer
  • Why have most Indians settled in the coastal regions and the Indo-Gangetic Plain?
    14·2 answers
  • Why is the Sabbath holy to Jewish people?
    7·1 answer
  • What was Hitler's plan for conquering France?​
    15·1 answer
  • Which physical feature in Africa borders the Mediterranean Sea?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!