Answer:
Each of L team leaders has D group directors, making the total number of group directors equal to (L)(D). And each of those group directors has F fundraisers, again requiring multiplication: that total is (L)(D)(F). (You can try this by plugging in small numbers - if each of 2 leaders has 3 directors, you know there would be 6 directors)
So while statement 1 is not sufficient (there are multiple combinations that could get you to 81, such as L = 1, D = 2, and F = 39; or L = 1, D = 5, and F = 15), statement 2 guarantees that there is only one team leader. This is because 5 is a prime number, and you know that the number of group directors = LD. The only possible way for LD to equal 5 is if L is 1 and D is 5, or if D is 1 and L is 5. And since the stimulus tells you that there are more directors than leaders, the combination must be 5 directors and 1 leader. Accordingly, statement 2 is sufficient.
Explanation:
Answer:
Total equivalent units= 4,190
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Beginning Work in Process (30% complete, $1,600) 250 units
Ending inventory of Work in Process (70% complete) 450 units
Total units started during the year 3,700 units
<u>We need to calculate the number of units completed and transferred out.</u>
Beginning work in process= 250*0.7= 175
Units started and completed= 3,700
Ending work in process equivalent units= 450*0.7= 315
Total equivalent units= 4,190
Answer:
no idea
Explanation:
brochures cannot be removed for they help in breathing system
Answer:
1. Authorized shares = 300,000 shares
2. Issued shares = 160,000 shares
3. Outstanding shares
= Issued shares- Shares repurchased
= 160,000 - 25,000
= 135,000 shares
Explanation:
Authorized shares are shares that a firm is allowed by law to issue to the public.
Issued shares are shares that a company offers to the public for subscription.
Outstanding shares are shares remaining after the share repurchase.
Answer:
a.
Primary sources represent the law itself as interpreted by the statutory, administrative and judicial entities of the government while secondary sources can be generally defined as interpretations of the law done by non-governmental entities.
b.
The type of authority which professional tax research conclusions should be based on are the primary sources.
Explanation:
a.
Primary sources of tax information are documents that are provided directly by an authority usually the government. Primary sources usually carry heavy weight especially when there is a conflict in the understanding of a federal tax law. These sources are often used by law practitioners as a basis in understanding cases of a similar nature. Some examples of primary sources of tax information include; internal revenue code, final and temporary regulations, non-codified federal tax statutes, and judicial decisions on tax matters. In general primary sources represent the law itself as interpreted by the statutory, administrative and judicial entities of the government. They can be used in a case where a tax payer in arguing his or her case about their tax position in a court of law.
Secondary sources of tax information are documents that are provided by information vendors who provide research services, legal analysis and tax professionals. These sources usually rely on the professionalism and experience of individuals who have gained a reputation on tax law for advice and direction. Some examples of secondary sources include; legal periodicals like academic journals, legal analysts, scholars and tax law reporters. Secondary sources can be generally defined as interpretations of the law done by non-governmental entities.
b.
Professional research is usually done to enable one advance in his/her career in order to gain acceptance as an expert in that particular field. For one to join the ranks of a professional, they first need to prove their mastery of the knowledge in that particular profession. In our case, one needs to be aware of the law as provided by an authority. This means that one needs to argue his/her case in reference to the primary sources since these sources carry more weight in terms of understanding and experience as opposed to secondary sources that represent personal views that might be susceptible to bias. On this note, the type of authority which professional tax research conclusions should be based on are the primary sources.
