Answer:
d. Revenue of $375
Explanation:
The amount paid by the Vetmed associates is an expense for associates
The amount received by statisticians is a revenue for them
Mackie Services an intermediate between the two and so, the percentage amount received by Mackie Services is a revenue
Mackie's income statement would include a revenue of:
= Amount paid to statisticians * % Received
= $1,500 * 25%
= $375
In a decision to either sell as is or process a product further, joint costs are considered irrelevant and process further costs are considered relevant.
The decision of whether to sell the product right away or wait to sell it in order to earn more money. Although we think that growing the business's income is great, we also need to make sure that the costs associated with the growth will be met. We must contrast the profit margin between selling now and selling later because additional processes will demand more resources and expenses.
Additionally, we need to make an effort to maximise the return on our investment. Additional processes might need more money spent on equipment. These factors require us to apply the sell or process further technique in order to choose the best course of action.
Typically, this scenario occurs in a joint product where one or more outputs can be generated and produce additional revenue. The joint products are produced at the same cost up until the point where they are divided and further sold or processed. Although the products can be sold at the split point, there are instances when continuing developing them is more profitable.
Learn more about joint cost here brainly.com/question/14988439
#SPJ4
Answer:When countries trade, their consumers have access to raw goods at cheaper prices, workers will produce better goods for export, and countries will become Richer..
Answer:
D. Zeta prevails, but only if the assignment is signed and in writing
Explanation:
Zeta prevails but only if the assignment is in writing and is signed.
If the assignment is express thereby and is signed by the parties in contract , then zeta can demand the amount from willy. Without any written consent and permission , willy cannot enforce the payment to zeta.
This is the best option in this case .
Answer:
may be liable for both the negligent and intentional acts.
Explanation:
In the case when an agent is within the scope of agent relationship that committed both type of acts i.e. negligent and intentional that results the injury to the third party so here the principal may be liable for both the act i.e. negligent and intentional as it is followed by the doctrine of respodeat superior
Therefore the second option is correct
