Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
Adrian is a court reporter. A court reporter or court stenographer, also called stenotype operator, shorthand reporter, or law reporter, is a person whose occupation is to transcribe spoken or recorded speech into written form in court
Answer:
(3) Joint venture
Explanation:
Once a company has decided to enter the global marketplace, it must select a means of market entry. Four general options exist: (1) exporting; (2) licensing; (3) <u>joint venture</u>; and (4) direct investment.
Joint venture refers to <u>an association that occurs between two companies that are usually located in different countries, in which they combine marketing strategies in order to increase their revenues and enter the global marketplace.</u>
An example is the joint venture of General Motors–Suzuki. This "alliance" was <u>extremely beneficial for both companies</u>, as it allowed Suzuki to access both American and European markets, while General Motors employees learned important Japanese manufacturing methods.
People found life more convenient, as these inventions gave them more opportunities and freedoms.
People became frustrated, as the expense of these inventions put them out of reach of most consumers. People rejected these inventions, preferring to do things as they had been done in the past.