Answer:The consent of the governed
Explanation:
War of the first coalition
Answer:
B) The excitement of the accident and the speedy response of the rescuer would be considered in a case such as this.
Explanation:
D) is incorrect; the driver would have a defense if he could demonstrate that the rescuer's actions were reckless.
(A) is incorrect because, while the court can conclude that the rescuer recklessly put himself in danger, this is not an absolute defense.
(C) is an incorrect statement of law; assumption of risk may be applicable, depending on the circumstances, such as if the rescue were reckless.
Answer:
B) thinking about all the irresponsible or inept things she's ever done.
Explanation:
By thinking about her irresponsibility, you can make a balance bewteen her advantages and disadvantages in order to decide whether she is suitable for the position or not. Also, you can evaluate if your reaction was appropriate and apologize to her if necessary.
Answer:
cognitive dissonance theory.
Explanation:
Cognitive dissonance theory: This theory refers to a situation that involves a clash in the beliefs, attitudes, and behavior of an individual.
Example: A person smokes instead of knowing that smoking causes cancer.
If there is any inconsistency that occurs in the behavior and attitude of a person then cognitive dissonance occurs. And to remove dissonance, the attitude and behavior of a person must be similar.
