1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLga [1]
3 years ago
12

What was the main difference between Doves and Hawks regarding U.S. presence in Vietnam?

History
2 answers:
aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Doves believed that the Vietnam war was a local conflict and was against Jhonson's war policy. While the Hawks believed that Vietnam was crucial in the Cold War.

Explanation:

Hawks & Doves are two-term used in war situations or schemes to classify supporters and opposers. In Vietnam, they were troops on the battlefield, as well as outside the battlefield. But it applied more to troops backing the move, they are called hawks and doves, because hawks hunt to eat, while doves eat mostly fruits and seeds.

asambeis [7]3 years ago
5 0
Doves believed that the Vietnam conflict was a localized civil war and did not agree with Johnson's policy whereas hawks supported Johnson's policy and believed Vietnam was a crucial front in the cold war. I hope this answer helps. Looking forward to help you again.
You might be interested in
When immigrants move to a new country in search of better jobs and living conditions, problems can arise due to _____.
Tems11 [23]

Answer:

I feel like it can either be A. economic growth that is too rapid or C. increased demands on services and jobs. It depends on the scenario given. I'd choose A but I still feel like it genuinely can be either.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hunter gathered to farmers<br><br>Information
VLD [36.1K]
I am not sure this is a question, it is a statement. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the system of checks and balances strengthen democracy in the United States?
Feliz [49]
Each branch of government controls a certain aspect of the other.

Legislative can restrict the policies of the executive and judicial. 

Judicial can strike down legislation deemed unconstitutional, and undo executive decisions through rulings on their constitutionality.

Executive Orders can bypass legislative channels for more efficient decision making, and can nominate if not alter the Supreme Court along with taking part in it's processes. ( Some of this is my own interpretation. )
5 0
3 years ago
What effects did the environment had on the hunter gathers?
Svet_ta [14]
They were able to plant and grow crops also hunt the animals they needed.
3 0
3 years ago
Described a sumerian village​
mamaluj [8]
Villages and towns were built around ubaid farming communities. They are known as Sumerians. They were in control of the area by 3000 B.C. Their culture was comprised of a group of city-states.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A 2012 conference in p'yŏngyang reviewed plans to restore the environment and ________ in north korea.
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP FOR HISTORY ASAPPPP!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Alexander the Great's men turn against him after he was called the "Great King"?
    13·1 answer
  • Roy is an archaeologist during a recent archaeologist dig in china he discovered quite a tablet that contains a series of diagra
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!! ITS TIMED!!!!!!! Which space craft set off for Jupiter in 1972?
    13·1 answer
  • In which language did the Jews first write the Torah?
    10·1 answer
  • Could anyone help me with this?
    5·2 answers
  • Explain why the federal government might sometimes
    12·1 answer
  • What is the most pressing reason why women were given limited rights during ancient times? Answer in not less than 3 sentences.​
    10·2 answers
  • What is the maximum number of years a president may serve?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!