Answer: C. II and III
Explanation:
There are 5,000,000 shares of PDQ Corporation as of when they declared the rights offering. This means that every share will get a right to buy stock.
However, as only 1,000,000 shares are being offered per the 5,000,000 shares outstanding it means that one stock may be purchased for every 5 rights.
A customer who owns 500 shares will therefore get 500 rights.
However with one stock up for sale per 5 rights they will receive the opportunity to buy;
= 500/5
= 100 shares
Simple; It's wrong. Many companys do the same thing and are still successful.
Answer:
C: Civil law and private law only
Explanation:
This won't be part of Public law as it generally works on the relationship between civilians and the government. However, in such a case, the matter can be sought privately, between molly and the owner of the car she damaged.
Obviously,. due to state laws in place that prohibit using a cell phone while driving this might also become a civil law situation.
Answer:
- Income = $10,000
- Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) Deduction = $0
- Claim $10,000 as itemized deduction due to expenses
Explanation:
The activity being a hubby does not exempt it from tax so the $10,000 will be included as income for tax purposes and there will be no deduction for this from the AGI.
She can however, claim her expenses as itemized deductions. There is no tax on interest payment so expenses deducted are:
= 4,000 + 6,500 - 500
= $10,000
Answer:
The answer is B. Ethan has more experience than Karen.
Explanation:
Now, lets take each Answer option separately and see why only B is correct.
Option A is no longer legally accepted or ethical. Perhaps during the era of segregation back in 1960s' this option could have been acceptable. But today it is illegal and is considered as a violation of basic human rights.
Option C is not correct as well because although people with special needs and physical requirements are entitled to receive certain special treatments, paying them more solely based on their disability is not considered suitable nor ethical.
Option D is unacceptable. No one can assume that men have more stamina than women. There are competent, strong and qualified women who can do their jobs much better than men. So we cannot accept this as an answer.
Option E is incorrect as well. Although a person could be an immigrant, once that person has lawfully taken the citizenship of a country, that "immigrant" is considered as a "citizen" of that country (this is not applicable for illegal immigrants!).
However, we can take option B as the answer. This is because when comparing a new employee with a more experienced employee, we can't see any problem in paying the experienced employee more.
