Answer:
6%
Explanation:
Yield to maturity is the annual rate of return that an investor receives if a bond bond is held until the maturity. It is the long term return of the bond which is expressed in annual term.
Face value = F = $1,000
Coupon payment = $1,000 x 7.5% = $75
Selling price = P = $1110.40
Number of payment = n = 10 years
Yield to maturity = [ C + ( F - P ) / n ] / [ (F + P ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $75 + ( $1,000 - $1,110.4 ) / 10 ] / [ ( $1,000 + $1,110.4 ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $75 - 11.04 ] / $1,055.2
Yield to maturity = $63.96 / $1,055.2
Yield to maturity = 0.0606 = 6.06%
Rounded off to whole percentage 6%
Answer:
A residential property is greatly diminished in value because of the constant noise of jets taking off from a recently expanded municipal airport. In order to be compensated for this loss, the owner could:
B.bring a suit alleging inverse condemnation
Explanation:
A law suit is a claim or legal problem taken to a court of law by an individual or organization rather than the authorities for a legal decision to be made. In the case above, the residential property diminished in value after constant noise of jets taking off from a recently expanded municipal airport. The loss in value is as a result of the recently expanded municipal airport and the property owner wants to be compensated for this loss.
In law, there are different terminologies and phrases that have specific meaning, some of them are as follows;
1. Inverse condemnation
Inverse condemnation is a case where a government entity takes private property or influences the value of that private property in one way or another then fails to compensate. In our case, this law suit can apply since the municipal airport is under the jurisdiction of the government and there action of expanding the airport caused a decline in value of neighboring residential property thus they should compensate the owner for this loss. The owner can bring a suit alleging inverse compensation.
Answer:
Short-term.
Explanation:
Short-term can be explained to be financing of business for short period of time from different sources. This financing are seen to be in the periods of a year and is said to be for smaller scale businesses.
It is easily necessary to secure additional funds to cover expenses, especially for those smaller businesses or to take the next step in growing the business. These short term loans are seen to be a lending option that work for many businesses that experience seasonal revenue fluctuations, and are easily taken back from the enterprise on a daily basis or monthly to cover up for the year.
Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
Answer:
$58,740
Explanation:
The computation of the cash paid is shown below:
For March month
= March purchase × remaining percentage
= $53,000 × 80%
= $42,400
For April month
= April purchase × given percentage × after applying cash discount
= $86,000 × 20% × 95%
= $16,340
So, the total amount of cash paid would be
= $42,400 + $16,340
= $58,740
Simply we multiply the monthly percentage with their percentage criteria
