The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The question does not include options. However, we can answer it in the following way.
After Mateo, a student in your class reads a series of scientific articles discussing the value of multiple vitamin supplements in preventing heart disease, he approaches you and remarks, "I’m confused. If all of these scientists are studying the same issue and are all using the scientific method, why aren’t they all coming to the same conclusions?"
My response should emphasize the fact that studies and experiments include different data, scenarios, people, and the interpretation of results is not always the same. It varies according to the purpose of the study and the premises.
That is something important to consider in these kinds of studies. Scientists and researches often interpret the results according to their goals, experience, expectations, and variables. That is why there is a variety of conclusions regarding one topic of study.
In think number (4 )Natural selection is the oldest form of genetic engineering.
Sand forms when rocks break down from weathering and eroding over thousands and even millions of years.
And anyways everything decays it might take 1 to millions of years but everything decays.
The major issue was that it had no central government and the economy was broke.
The split refers to the different opinions about who was the rightful successor of Mohammad: all of the four caliphs (Sunnis think so) or only one of them, Ali (Shiia). Ali was killed in the early fight for power, and his two sons were too, which has contributed to the feeling of martyrdom among the Shiia.
