Answer: Predictive validity
Explanation: Predictive validity shows the extent to which a score on a scale predicts scores on some criterion measure. For example, the validity of a cognitive test for job performance is the correlation between test scores and the performance rating of the supervisor.There are four types of validity, they are face, construct, content, and predictive validity inclusive.
Answer:
Kantian Ethics
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
- Egoism
- Act utility
- Rule utility
- Kantian Ethics
In this example, Greg is employing Kantian ethics to deal with this question. Kantian ethics are an example of a deontological moral theory. This means that an act is wrong or right not based on the consequence of the act, but based on whether this act fulfills our duty or not. In this example, Greg argues that he "must try." This is the duty he has to fulfill. Therefore, the way in which he thinks about morality is based on duties, and whether these apply to him or not.
<u>Principle of internal control </u>does not include application of technological controls
Explanation:
<u>The seven important internal control procedures include separation/segregation of duties/job responsibilities , providing access to various controls, performing physical audits, standardization of documents, trial balances, periodic reconciliations of the financial statements , and approval authority.</u>
Answer: Secretive.
Explanation: The character of the described paragraph is a person who, looking for something eagerly, something that he considers as yours and that, however, if seen by others, would be taken from him, shows decision in his task, and precision in his act, since the last thing he wants is to be observed, detected in his intention.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
